Unit rationale, description and aim
Technologies such as artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented realities, and the “internet of things” (IoT) have opened rich possibilities for learning. They also raise important questions about what it means to be human, how we relate to each other, and how we make ethical use of these powerful technologies to support learning within schools. Advances in neuroscience complement these technology advances.
This interdisciplinary unit is a conversation between the Catholic intellectual tradition, emerging technologies, and contemporary learning sciences to explore how educational leaders ethically and constructively respond to these developments.
This unit develops skills in interdisciplinary knowledge practice. Students utilise philosophical, ethical, and theological tools and processes to refine their philosophy and practice of education. They gain experience in effectively communicating these complex insights to their communities.
Learning outcomes
To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.
Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.
Explore the graduate capabilities.
Explain recent technological developments and thei...
Learning Outcome 01
Acquire interdisciplinary skills to enhance their ...
Learning Outcome 02
Develop ethical and theological insights (APST 6.2...
Learning Outcome 03
Communicate effectively complex and specialist con...
Learning Outcome 04
Content
Topics will include:
- Visions of life: imago dei, anthropos, Dreaming
- From Turing to Zuckerberg: intelligent learning reconsidered
- The rise of digital pedagogies and their impact
- Machine learning and social media
- Avatars and the metaverse
- Progression or regression?
- Neuroscience
- What counts as evidence?
- What are the ethics of the evidence?
- The dance of science, data, and spirit
- Enhancing learning
- Emergence and the ethics of sense-making
- Ethical inquiry (digital representation, AR/VR, neuro-data): what is valid and reliable?
- Ethical evaluation: what is good, and for whom?
- Ethical response: how do I now lead?
Assessment strategy and rationale
The assessment tasks for this unit are designed for students to demonstrate achievement of each of the learning outcomes. Assessment tasks build on each other through a developmental and applied approach and provide students with the opportunity to meet the unit learning outcomes and develop graduate attributes and professional standards and criteria consistent with University assessment requirements.
Assessment 1 requires students to reflect on recent advances in their professional practice. Students are to evaluate technology advances from an ethical and theological perspective, thereby grounding the learning in the specific faith context of Catholic education. It also complements the critical perspective on innovation and change that is evident in other units. Assessment 2 then requires students to consider what actions can be taken within their sphere of professional practice in light of their learning.
The assessment tasks and their weighting for this unit are mapped to demonstrate the achievement of the learning outcomes and the related academic and professional standards.
In order to pass this unit, students are required to successfully complete both assessment tasks regardless of their mode of enrolment.
Overview of assessments
Assessment Task 1: Historical Analysis and Critic...
Assessment Task 1: Historical Analysis and Critical Discussion
Provide a historical overview of changes in two educational technologies and summarise their (claimed) impact on learning. Discuss their implications with consideration of ethics and contemporary theological debate.
50%
Assessment Task 2: Critical Analysis Critically ...
Assessment Task 2: Critical Analysis
Critically evaluate how educational leaders can respond ethically to the challenges identified in Assessment Task 1 (priorities to be determined based on student’s context, e.g., faculty/stage, school, system, ecclesial).
50%
Learning and teaching strategy and rationale
This unit may be offered in online, on campus or in multimode, for the equivalence of 150 hours of study. This unit adopts an interdisciplinary approach to the challenges of technology and its use within contemporary education. It focuses on the ways in which technology impacts ontological and epistemological assumptions on which educational processes are based. The nature of technological change is examined first through historical analyses of recent changes. Discussion and case study methods are employed to evaluate the ethical, relational, and theological implications of these changes. Students then develop and articulate how their personal philosophy of education responds to the challenges posed. Possible actions flowing from this are also presented.
AUSTRALIAN PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS - LEAD
On successful completion of this unit, students should have gained evidence towards the following standards:
AUSTRALIAN PROFESSIONAL STANDARD FOR PRINCIPALS - PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
In addition to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers this unit addresses the following Professional Practices: