There is a strong relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV ) and animal abuse with a high prevalence of animal abuse in households with IPV (Cleary et al., 2021). Animal abuse is used as a form of control over the human victim of IPV, impacting their decision to leave the violent relationship or seek support (Cleary et al., 2021; Montgomery et al., 2024). Animal abuse had long-lasting psychological impacts to both the human and animal victims (Cleary et al.,2021), with some situations requiring forced separation of the IPV victim from their pet leading to high risk for emotional trauma, stress and guilt (Montgomery et al., 2024).
Research Aim: To examine the role of pets in the decision-making processes of women in a violent relationship to their decision to stay in, or leave, the relationship, and seeking support for themselves and their pets.
Methodology: This project will utilise a survey approach by combining and modifying 2 validated surveys.
- Partner’s Treatment of Animals Scale (PTAS) – this is a 21-item survey designed to measure animal abuse specifically within the context of intimate partner violence (Fitzgerald., et al., 2016)
- Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) – this is a 78-item survey instrument that measures type and severity of conflict within relationships. (Strauss et al, 1996)
References
- Cleary, M., Thapa, D.K., West, S., Westman, M., & Kornhaber, R. (2021). Animal abuse in the context of adult intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior,61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101676
- Fitzgerald, A., Barrett, B., Shwom, R., Stevenson, R., & Chernyak, E. (2016). Development of the Partner’s Treatment of Animals Scale. Anthrozoös, 29(4), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1228760
- Montgomery, J., Lloyd, J., & Liang, Z. (2024). The Impact of Forced Separations Between Women and Their Pets in Domestic Violence Situations and the Effectiveness of Crisis Response: Protocol for a Conceptual Framework. JMIR research protocols, 13, e52067. https://doi.org/10.2196/52067
- Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
Supervisors:
Associate Professor Rebecca O’Reilly Rebecca.O'Reilly@acu.edu.au
Associate Professor Fiona McDermid Fiona.McDermid@acu.edu.au
Campus: All