Unit rationale, description and aim

In an era of deepfakes, viral misinformation, and contested narratives, this interdisciplinary subject equips students with essential skills to navigate complex questions of truth and evidence. Drawing from the arts, humanities, and social sciences, students explore how ‘truth’ is constructed, challenged, and manipulated across different contexts. 

This unit examines infamous historical scandals, moral panics, and propaganda campaigns to understand how societies determine what counts as evidence. Students also investigate contemporary challenges, including artificial intelligence and social media misinformation. Through case studies ranging from historical cover-ups and exposés, to political scandals, students learn to investigate different kinds of evidence and the power dynamics that produce and validate them. Core skills development focuses on critical inquiry methods, incorporating Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and global Indigenous perspectives to broaden analytical frameworks. Students master information literacy, source evaluation, and logical reasoning while learning practical skills in reading, writing, research, and media analysis.  

The aim of this unit is to develop students' capacity for critical inquiry and evidence-based reasoning across diverse academic and real-world contexts. By semester's end, students will have developed a sophisticated toolkit for questioning sources, identifying bias, and conducting credible research—essential capabilities for academic success and informed citizenship. 

2027 10

Campus offering

No unit offerings are currently available for this unit.

Prerequisites

Nil

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Recognise patterns of deception, propaganda, and m...

Learning Outcome 01

Recognise patterns of deception, propaganda, and misinformation across historical and contemporary contexts.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC3, GC4, GC7, GC9, GC11

Discuss the credibility and reliability of diverse...

Learning Outcome 02

Discuss the credibility and reliability of diverse sources while understanding how cultural prejudices and power relations influence knowledge construction.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC4, GC7, GC9, GC11, GC12

Produce original work that appropriately acknowled...

Learning Outcome 03

Produce original work that appropriately acknowledges sources and demonstrates ethical use of digital tools, while maintaining authentic scholarly voice and critical thinking.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC9, GC10, GC11

Apply appropriate research methodologies while mai...

Learning Outcome 04

Apply appropriate research methodologies while maintaining ethical standards and incorporating Indigenous perspectives into relevant inquiry frameworks.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC5, GC9, GC10, GC11

Present research outcomes through clear, well-stru...

Learning Outcome 05

Present research outcomes through clear, well-structured written and oral communications that acknowledge different viewpoints and demonstrate understanding of complex issues.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Content

Topics and content may include (but are not limited to) the following themes, issues and questions in the arts, humanities, and social sciences: 

  • Infamous scandals over truth, lies or imposture 
  • Explorations of evidence, misinformation and deceit 
  • What is a fact, and who produced the evidence behind it? 
  • Situations when there’s not ‘one truth’ or the truth is contested or misremembered. 
  • Moral panic or social hysteria: when people believe something to be true when it is not, or because its importance has been disproportionally exaggerated. 
  • Investigating the use of propaganda and censorship 
  • Controversies over technology, eg deepfakes and artificial intelligence 
  • How do factors like cultural perspectives, social norms or forms of prejudice shape what individuals and societies accept to be true? 
  • How do power relations influence the types of questions that might be asked or valued in particular societies? 

Skills developed in this unit include:  

  • Inquiry skills in the arts, humanities and social science disciplines 
  • Recognising and incorporating Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and global Indigenous perspectives to enhance the scope and quality of inquiry. 
  • Creating a habit of asking the right questions about sources of information 
  • Asking questions to elicit credible and authentic information 
  • Finding online sources of information 
  • Identifying fallacies of logic 
  • Examining resources for news and media literacy 
  • Acquiring information literacy 

Assessment strategy and rationale

Three assessments enable students to meet learning outcomes and develop graduate attributes. The foundational critical thinking project develops essential skills including questioning sources, identifying and analysing arguments, and creating synthesised responses. This interconnected approach ensures effective critical thinking development through practical application.

The skills development portfolio comprises written submissions, in-class activities, and tests examining how questioning techniques apply across arts, humanities, and social science disciplines and workplace contexts. Compulsory attendance ensures students participate in collaborative learning activities, receive immediate feedback during skill development exercises, and complete mandatory in-class assessment components that cannot be replicated in other formats. Critical thinking skills develop through guided practice and real-time instructor feedback during classroom discussions.

The investigative research task requires students to investigate a specific scandal from topics provided, investigate relevant sources, apply skills in planning research, and present findings in written, oral or digital formats as specified by the lecturer. Each assessment builds progressively, from foundational critical thinking skills through practical application to independent research, ensuring comprehensive development of inquiry capabilities essential for academic success and informed citizenship.

To achieve passing standard, students must meet all hurdle requirements, including attendance, engage in the full range of learning activities and submit assessments meeting the learning outcomes.

Overview of assessments

Assessment Task 1:   Foundational Critical Thinki...

Assessment Task 1:  Foundational Critical Thinking Project

Students explore and explain competing aspects of hotly debated areas covered in the unit. Using primary and secondary sources, students will recognise patterns of deception, propaganda, and misinformation across historical and contemporary contexts and different public responses to this. 

Weighting

10%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4, GC7, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Assessment Task 2:   Hands-on Skill Development A...

Assessment Task 2:  Hands-on Skill Development Activities

Structured cohort activities examining information source questions across the arts, humanities and social science disciplines. In-class tasks develop skills in questioning, ethical guidelines, debating, media analysis, source location and other foundational abilities. While undertaken collaboratively, assessment is completed individually. 

This task helps students clarify thinking, consider purpose and context, question information sources, identify arguments, and evaluate others' arguments. 

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4, GC7, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Assessment Task 3:  Investigative Task The asses...

Assessment Task 3: Investigative Task

The assessment investigates evidence and sources regarding scandals, moral panics or deceptions. 

Students investigate a specific scandal from topics provided, apply research planning skills, and present and defend findings in written, oral or digital formats.  

The presentation and defence of research findings may occur in a classroom or exam setting using written, oral or digital formats as specified by the lecturer. 

Weighting

40%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4, GC7, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Hurdle Requirement:   Students must attend at lea...

Hurdle Requirement: 

Students must attend at least 80% of classes, including in-class assessments, as this foundational unit teaches essential Bachelor of Arts study skills required in the learning outcomes and provides interactive opportunities, feedback and supervised assessments. 

Weighting

Pass/Fail

Learning Outcomes LO5
Graduate Capabilities GC2, GC3, GC7, GC9, GC10, GC11

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

This unit embraces active learning, including collaborative enquiry-based learning, delivered face-to-face with appropriate online components. Compulsory attendance is essential as the interactive nature of tutorials and collaborative activities cannot be replicated through independent study. In-person participation ensures students engage in real-time discussion, receive immediate feedback, and benefit from peer learning opportunities that are fundamental to developing critical thinking skills.

The unit develops foundational skills for effective investigation, critical analysis, evaluation and communication across the arts, humanities and social sciences through structured learning activities and formal assessments. Lectures provide core content and begin the process of exploring it, while tutorials follow-up with more detailed explanation and exploration of sources and case studies. Regular attendance ensures students experience the scaffolded progression of concepts and maintain engagement with evolving discussions.

The unit scaffolds skill development through three key areas. First, students build strategies for locating, interpreting and interrogating information sources across disciplinary contexts. Second, it introduces approaches to critically examining sources, asking productive questions, and detecting strengths and weaknesses of different data and evidence forms. Finally, students develop abilities to articulate and communicate findings for academic and other audiences by constructing coherent, engaging arguments in various formats.

Representative texts and references

Browne, M. Neil, and Stuart M. Keeley. Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking. Pearson, 2015. 

Farkas, Johan, and Jannick Schou. Post-truth, Fake News and Democracy: Mapping the Politics of Falsehood. Routledge. 2019. 

Giusti, Serena, and Elisa Piras. Democracy and Fake News: Information Manipulation and Post-Truth Politics. Routledge, 2021. 

Haber, J. Critical Thinking,MIT Press, 2020. 

Christopher Schaberg, The Work of Literature in an Age of Post-Truth, Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. 

Kansteiner, Wulf. “Digital Doping for Historians: Can History, Memory, and Historical Theory Be Rendered Artificially Intelligent?” History and Theory : Studies in the Philosophy of History 61, no. 4 (2022): 119–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12282

Livsey, Tim. ‘Open Secrets: The British “Migrated Archives”, Colonial History, and Postcolonial History’. History Workshop Journal 93, no. 1 (2022): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbac002. 

Schwartz, A. Brad. Broadcast Hysteria: Orson Welles’s War of the Worlds and the Art of Fake News Hill and Wang A division of Farrar Straus and Giroux, 2016. 

 https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2016.1224435

Skogerbø, Eli, Kerry McCallum, and Tanja Dreher. “Overshadowed Voices in Media Reporting on Truth-Telling Commissions.” Media, Culture & Society 47, no. 1 (2025): 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241276125. 

van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy Theories as Part of History: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. 

 https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615  


Web resources 

Verification Handbook | DataJournalism.com 

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEST,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs