Unit rationale, description and aim

This unit (HLSC623 Research Dissertation Part A) and its subsequent unit (HLSC624 Research Dissertation Part B) involve the completion of a research project leading to the preparation of an academic dissertation of normally up to 15,000 words and no more than 18,000 words. The dissertation fulfils the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) requirement for independent project work within a Master by coursework.

This unit supports students in applying a range of theoretically based advanced knowledge and skills to foster culturally safe, high-quality, and effective health care. Students will identify a research question and formulate a defensible research proposal based on a critical review of relevant literature. Under the guidance of an approved supervisor, students will design and commence an individual research project that provides insight into a defined research question. Students will critically evaluate the role of evidence-based and ethical practice in developing effective responses to a unique health-related administrative, leadership, educational, or clinical challenge. The resulting enquiry will be documented in a dissertation submitted for independent examination.

The aim of this unit is to provide students with the opportunity to undertake independent research and develop as self-reliant and critically reflective professionals engaged in lifelong learning.

2027 20

Campus offering

Find out more about study modes.

Unit offerings may be subject to minimum enrolment numbers.

Please select your preferred campus.

  • Term Mode
  • ACU Term 1Online Unscheduled, Online Unscheduled
  • ACU Term 3Online Unscheduled, Online Unscheduled

Prerequisites

(HLSC640 Interpreting Health Research OR HLSC690 Research and Inquiry Skills for Health Sciences ) AND (HLSC646 Qualitative Research Methods OR HLSC647 Quantitative Research Methods OR HLSC642 Biostatistics for Health Sciences ) AND a minimum GPA of 5.0 across a minimum of 60 cp of completed units.

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Create and manage a substantial research project, ...

Learning Outcome 01

Create and manage a substantial research project, demonstrating advanced scholarly judgement in the design, implementation, and evaluation of research processes
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Synthesise relevant literature to develop well-gro...

Learning Outcome 02

Synthesise relevant literature to develop well-grounded research questions and an appropriate methodology for addressing complex research problems.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Manage research processes in accordance with rigor...

Learning Outcome 03

Manage research processes in accordance with rigorous ethical standards and advanced methodological principles, demonstrating integrity and professional responsibility
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Critically analyse research findings to draw valid...

Learning Outcome 04

Critically analyse research findings to draw valid, evidence-based conclusions that contribute to theoretical and/or practical knowledge.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Synthesise research findings and relevant evidence...

Learning Outcome 05

Synthesise research findings and relevant evidence to develop a coherent and critically reasoned exposition of knowledge.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Content

Module 1: Research Dissertation Orientation

  • Purpose, structure and expectations of the dissertation
  • Understanding the dissertation as an independent research project
  • HLSC623 Part A and HLSC624 Part B: roles and expectations
  • Roles and responsibilities of the student and supervisor
  • Developing an individual research project plan
  • Establishing milestones and timelines
  • Managing an independent research project
  • Maintaining research records and supervision notes

Module 2: Developing and Refining the Research Project

  • Refining the research problem
  • Identifying and articulating the research gap
  • Developing and refining the research question
  • Establishing the significance and rationale for the study
  • Clarifying the scope and boundaries of the research
  • Developing the aim and objectives
  • Ensuring alignment between the problem, question, objectives and proposed study
  • Assessing feasibility
  • Responding to supervisor feedback

Module 3: Finding, Evaluating and Synthesising the Evidence

  • Developing and refining a literature search strategy
  • Identifying the most relevant literature
  • Organising and managing the literature
  • Structuring the literature review
  • Moving from literature summary to critical synthesis
  • Comparing and contrasting evidence
  • Identifying patterns, inconsistencies and gaps
  • Developing a coherent scholarly argument
  • Positioning the proposed research within the existing evidence
  • Developing a conceptual/theoretical framework where appropriate

Module 4: Developing and Justifying the Research Methodology

  • Translating the research question into an appropriate methodological approach
  • Developing the methodology for the student's own research project
  • Justifying methodological decisions
  • Describing the study design, setting and participants/sample
  • Planning recruitment and data collection
  • Selecting and justifying instruments or data sources
  • Developing the data analysis plan
  • Establishing methodological rigour
  • Addressing ethical and governance considerations
  • Identifying methodological limitations
  • Refining the methodology in response to feedback

Module 5: Building the Research Proposal and Thesis Foundations

  • Integrating the introduction, background, literature review and methodology
  • Developing a coherent thesis narrative
  • Ensuring alignment across the research project
  • Developing a defensible research rationale
  • Academic and scholarly writing
  • Critical rather than descriptive writing
  • Integrating and appropriately citing evidence
  • Referencing and academic integrity
  • Editing and improving scholarly writing
  • Responding effectively to supervisor feedback
  • Preparing the research proposal for assessment

Module 6: Research Ethics and Project Readiness

  • Applying ethical principles to the student's research
  • Preparing ethics documentation
  • Informed consent and participant information
  • Managing privacy, confidentiality and data security
  • Identifying and managing potential risks
  • Cultural safety and respectful research practice
  • Research governance requirements
  • Preparing research instruments and materials
  • Preparing recruitment materials
  • Developing a data management plan
  • Identifying potential implementation challenges
  • Developing contingency plans

Module 7: Transition to HLSC624 – Research Project Readiness

Students undertake a Part A completion and Part B readiness check:

  • Research question finalised
  • Aim and objectives finalised
  • Literature review completed
  • Methodology completed
  • Ethics/governance requirements addressed
  • Data collection tools ready
  • Recruitment strategy ready
  • Data management procedures established
  • Analysis plan established
  • Research timeline updated
  • Potential challenges identified
  • Supervisor feedback incorporated
  • Clear plan for HLSC624


Assessment strategy and rationale

HLSC623 employs a scaffolded assessment strategy to develop advanced research skills consistent with AQF Level 9 expectations and higher-order cognitive abilities. This structure supports students to progressively develop skills in research design, ethical reasoning, critical analysis, synthesis of evidence, and scholarly communication.

Assessment 1: Seminar

The Seminar is an oral task provides students with an opportunity to demonstrate their foundational understanding of the research process, critically engage with relevant literature, and communicate their proposed research direction through scholarly discussion.

Assessment 2: Research Project Proposal

The Project Proposal requires students to develop and justify a research plan by articulating a clear research question, critically synthesising relevant literature, selecting an appropriate methodology, and addressing ethical considerations. This assessment supports students in establishing a rigorous foundation for their independent research project.

Assessment 3: Thesis Chapters (Introduction, Background/Literature Review and Methods)

The development of the introductory chapter, background/literature review, and methodology chapters enables students to demonstrate advanced capability in research design, evidence synthesis, academic writing, and preparation for research implementation. Completing these foundational thesis components in HLSC623 ensures that students enter the following unit, HLSC624 Research Dissertation Part B, with an established research framework, enabling them to focus on data collection, analysis, interpretation of findings, and completion of the dissertation.

In order to pass the unit students must demonstrate achievement of every unit learning outcome and obtain a minimum mark of 50% in graded units.

Overview of assessments

Assessment Task 1- Seminar Enables students to ...

Assessment Task 1- Seminar

Enables students to achieve sound communication skills and to showcase their research to professional peers.  

Weighting

25%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5

Assessment Task 2 - Project Proposal Enables st...

Assessment Task 2 - Project Proposal

Enables students to show competence in research design - aim, objectives, expected outcomes, timeframes and evidence in support of the research.

Weighting

40%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO4, LO5

Assessment Task 3 - Introductory chapter, backgro...

Assessment Task 3 - Introductory chapter, background, methods 

Enables students to demonstrate competence in research design, research activity and academic writing.

Weighting

35%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

Learning will primarily occur through an ongoing, dialogic relationship between the student and their allocated supervisor. Students will negotiate a learning contract with their approved supervisor and be supported to develop and refine a research question. Through regular discussion and feedback, students will critically engage with their research ideas and apply knowledge and skills gained through their coursework to their own research project. Students will present their initial research proposal to professional peers before preparing and submitting their research proposal.

Students will meet regularly with their supervisor on an individual basis, with the frequency of consultation varying according to the stage of the research process and students' developing needs. This approach recognises students as increasingly independent learners who take responsibility for their learning and the successful progression of their research project. Meetings with the National Unit Leader throughout the semester will provide opportunities for students to reflect on their progress and identify areas where further support or skill development may be required.

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2024). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide. 3/e. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill. 

Booth, A., Martyn-St James, M., Clowes, M., & Sutton, A. (2021). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review.

Bush, H.M. (2012). Biostatistics: An applied introduction for the public health practitioner. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2024). Burns & grove’s the practice of nursing research appraisal, synthesis. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Saunders. 

Hoffmann, T., Bennet, S., & Del Mar, C. (2023). Evidence-based practice across the health professions (3rd ed.). London: Elsevier Health Sciences.  

Holly, C., Walmond, S. W., & Saimbert, M. K. (2021).  Comprehensive systematic review for advanced nursing practice. New York: Springer. 

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2022). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Melnyk, B. M., Tan, A., Hsieh, A. P., & Gallagher‐Ford, L. (2021). Evidence‐based practice culture and mentorship predict EBP implementation, nurse job satisfaction, and intent to stay: Support for the ARCC© model. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 18(4), 272-281.

Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2022). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, Pa.: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 

Walliman, N. (2021). Research methods: The basics. Routledge. 

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEST,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs