Unit rationale, description and aim

Junior secondary Languages plays a critical role in developing adolescents’ linguistic, intercultural and communicative capabilities in an increasingly interconnected world. Languages learning supports communication across cultures, reflection on language and culture, and ethical participation in diverse communities. Students need to develop proficiency in listening, speaking, reading, viewing and writing, alongside understanding how language, texts and cultural practices shape meaning, identity and relationships. Preservice teachers therefore require a strong understanding of the Years 7–10 Languages curriculum, including its structure, achievement standards and learning progressions in language use and intercultural understanding.

This unit develops preservice teachers’ capacity to teach Languages using evidence‑informed approaches that emphasise meaningful communication, language awareness and intercultural capability. Through communication‑focused tasks, inquiry and collaboration, preservice teachers engage with the Australian Curriculum: Languages and relevant documentation. They explore pedagogies such as explicit instruction, modelling, comprehensible input and output, scaffolded interaction, and the purposeful use of texts and digital tools. Preservice teachers analyse curriculum materials, identify learner needs and misconceptions, apply assessment strategies, and design coherent lesson and unit sequences.

The aim of this unit is to develop preservice teachers’ curriculum knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and assessment capability for effective Languages teaching in Years 7–10.

2027 10

Campus offering

No unit offerings are currently available for this unit.

Prerequisites

Nil

Incompatible

EDLA599 - Language Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment 1

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Describe the structure, intent and key features of...

Learning Outcome 01

Describe the structure, intent and key features of the Years 7–10 Languages curriculum, including disciplinary knowledge, numeracy expectations and cross curriculum priorities and capabilities.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Examine how students learn in Commerce and Busines...

Learning Outcome 02

Examine how students learn in Commerce and Business using appropriate resources and apply evidence informed strategies for teaching diverse learners.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC5, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC10, GC11, GC12

Critically analyse the concepts, substance and str...

Learning Outcome 03

Critically analyse the concepts, substance and structure of Languages curriculum and pedagogical models to inform purposeful planning and responsive instruction in junior secondary Languages.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Design coherent lesson and unit sequences in Langu...

Learning Outcome 04

Design coherent lesson and unit sequences in Languages that incorporate explicit instruction, differentiation and culturally responsive practices.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC5, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Appraise assessment strategies and feedback practi...

Learning Outcome 05

Appraise assessment strategies and feedback practices to monitor, support and improve student learning in Years 7–10 Languages.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Content

Topics will include:

  • Reflecting on prior experiences of teaching and learning in Years 7-10 Languages
  • Australian Curriculum for Years 7-10 Languages, including Cross‑Curriculum Priorities, General Capabilities and local curriculum documentation
  • Theories of learning and knowledge frameworks for Years 7-10 Languages pedagogy including Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), collaborative learning and explicit instruction
  • Designing units of work and related summative assessments for Years 7-10 Languages
  • Teaching strategies and approaches for Years 7–10 Languages, including explicit teaching of language systems and text features, meaningful communication in receptive and productive modes, interaction and mediation and intercultural reflection
  • Strategies for monitoring and differentiating student learning in Years 7-10 Languages, including formal and informal feedback, checklists, differentiated instruction model (content, process, product, learning environment)
  • Classroom verbal and non-verbal communication for Years 7-10 Languages, including the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) model, questioning, scaffolding and meaningful target‑language interaction
  • Resource development and curation to support Years 7-10 Languages teaching and learning that is ethical and professional, including the use of generative AI for language practice, comprehension support and feedback
  • Roles and professional responsibilities of a contemporary teacher of Years 7-10 Languages, including student safety and wellbeing in online environments, including generative AI.

Assessment strategy and rationale

Assessment in this unit is designed to support preservice teachers’ development of curriculum knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and assessment capability for teaching Languages in Years 7–10. The two tasks reflect authentic school-based responsibilities that preservice teachers will undertake during professional experience and early career teaching. Both tasks include explicit instruction on the ethical and appropriate use of generative AI for brainstorming, drafting and editing, with clear requirements regarding attribution, transparency and originality.

Task 1 requires preservice teachers to design a coherent Years 7–10 Languages unit of work aligned with curriculum requirements and culminating in a summative assessment task. This task assesses their ability to interpret curriculum intent, integrate evidence-informed pedagogical approaches, embed explicit instruction, differentiation and inclusive practices, and justify curriculum, pedagogical and assessment decisions using scholarly and policy evidence. Task 2 builds on this foundation by integrating a skills audit, microteaching episodes, and a reflective evaluation of pedagogical decisions. This design mirrors authentic school practice, where teachers identify learner needs, plan responsively, trial strategies, and evaluate their impact on student learning.

To pass this unit, preservice teachers need to complete all assessment tasks and receive a passing grade of 50% overall.

Overview of assessments

Hurdle Task - Skills Audit Complete a knowledge ...

Hurdle Task - Skills Audit

Complete a knowledge and skills audit based on your jurisdictional documentation to identify personal strengths and five (5) areas for development in teaching junior secondary Languages.

Weighting

Pass/Fail

Learning Outcomes LO1
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Assessment Task 1: Planning a Unit of Work Desig...

Assessment Task 1: Planning a Unit of Work

Design a coherent Year 7–10 Languages unit of work that aligns with curriculum requirements and leads to a selected summative assessment task. Integrate evidence informed approaches to:(1) develop content and skills relevant to developing Languages knowledge and skills;

(2) incorporate explicit instruction, differentiation and inclusive practices; and (3) critique curriculum, pedagogical and assessment decisions using relevant scholarly and policy evidence.

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC5, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC10, GC11, GC12
Standards APST(GA)2.1, APST(GA)2.5, APST(GA)2.6, APST(GA)3.2, APST(GA)3.3, 2.1.2

Assessment Task 2: Micro Teaching Plan and deliv...

Assessment Task 2: Micro Teaching

Plan and deliver three short microteaching episodes across the different learning areas within Languages. Integrate discipline specific and inclusive pedagogies, including differentiated approaches within the teaching episodes. Demonstrate providing clear instructions, precise explanations, and purposeful questioning. Prepare a reflective evaluation explaining your pedagogical decisions, use of resources, and impact on diverse learners.

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC5, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC10, GC11, GC12
Standards APST(GA)2.1, APST(GA)3.3, APST(GA)3.4, 2.1.1

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

The teaching approach in this unit is grounded in social constructivist and adult learning principles that promote active engagement, collaboration and reflective practice. Preservice teachers learn through a combination of modelling, critical reading, discussion and hands on activities that make pedagogical concepts visible. Tutorials introduce evidence-informed strategies relevant to Languages, including explicit instruction, inquiry-based learning, problem-solving, and collaborative learning. Throughout the unit, preservice teachers gather and evaluate evidence of their developing pedagogical capabilities and reflect on their progress against the Graduate Teacher Standards and Core Content.

Tutorials and microteaching activities provide opportunities to trial strategies, analyse student needs, and practise professional communication in supportive environments. Online modules and self-regulated learning extend access to theoretical content and allow preservice teachers to consolidate understanding at their own pace. Given the complexity of curriculum documents and pedagogical models, scaffolding is used to support learners who may need explicit navigation of concepts, while optional supports, accessible materials and multiple means of engagement ensure equitable participation for preservice teachers with disability or diverse learning needs.

Australian Professional Standards for Teachers - Graduate Level

In connection to the learning outcomes, on successful completion of this unit, pre-service teachers should have developed the following industry specific knowledge based on the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers - Graduate Level standards:

  • Relating toDemonstrate knowledge and understanding of physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students and how these may affect learning.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2

  • Relating toDemonstrate knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2

  • Relating toDemonstrate knowledge of teaching strategies that are responsive to the learning strengths and needs of students from diverse linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2

  • Relating toDemonstrate broad knowledge and understanding of the impact of culture, cultural identity and linguistic background on the education of students from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating toDemonstrate knowledge and understanding of strategies for differentiating teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toDemonstrate knowledge and understanding of the concepts, substance and structure of the content and teaching strategies of the teaching area.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5

  • Relating toOrganise content into an effective learning and teaching sequence.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating toUse curriculum, assessment and reporting knowledge to design learning sequences and lesson plans.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3, LO4, LO5

  • Relating toDemonstrate broad knowledge of, understanding of, and respect for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories, cultures and languages.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating toKnow and understand literacy and numeracy teaching strategies and their application in teaching areas.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toImplement teaching strategies for using ICT to expand curriculum learning opportunities for students.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toSet learning goals that provide achievable challenges for students of varying abilities and characteristics.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating toPlan lesson sequences using knowledge of student learning, content and effective teaching strategies.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating toInclude a range of teaching strategies.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toDemonstrate knowledge of a range of resources, including ICT, that engage students in their learning.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toDemonstrate the capacity to organise classroom activities and provide clear directions.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toDemonstrate an understanding of the relevant issues and the strategies available to support the safe, responsible and ethical use of ICT in learning and teaching.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO4

  • Relating toDemonstrate understanding of assessment strategies, including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches to assess student learning.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO5

  • Relating toDemonstrate an understanding of the purpose of providing timely and appropriate feedback to students about their learning.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO5

  • Relating toDemonstrate understanding of assessment moderation and its application to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO5

  • Relating toDemonstrate the capacity to interpret student assessment data to evaluate student learning and modify teaching practice.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO5

  • Relating toDemonstrate an understanding of the role of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers in identifying professional learning needs.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating toUnderstand the relevant and appropriate sources of professional learning for teachers.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating toDemonstrate an understanding of the rationale for continued professional learning and the implications for improved student learning.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating toUnderstand the role of external professionals and community representatives in broadening teachers’ professional knowledge and practice.

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) Core Content

On successful completion of this unit, pre-service teachers should have developed the following industry specific knowledge based on the AITSL Core Content:

  • Relating toThe difference in the process of knowledge acquisition in the brain of a novice vs the brain of an expert. This should be taught with reference to the development of mental models and schemas. 

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2

  • Relating toWhy teaching practices must adapt as a student’s familiarity with the knowledge of a subject increases, including when to move from scaffolded practice to independent practice, and why this is important. 

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2

  • Relating toHow to develop and use worked examples for students who are unfamiliar with a subject, followed by more challenging problem-solving activities as students become more familiar with the knowledge of a subject. 

    Relevant learningLO3, LO4

  • Relating toThe key features of coherent and deliberate planning and sequencing of tasks and lessons including curriculum-aligned learning objectives, clear descriptions of how students will show evidence of mastery, the common progression of learning in a subject area and the critical curriculum knowledge needed for students to progress. 

    Relevant learningLO1, LO3, LO4

  • Relating toHow to plan a sequence of lessons that incorporate spacing and retrieval practice, build upon each other, meet students where they are in their learning and help students retrieve past learning and consolidate it in long-term memory. 

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2, LO4

  • Relating toHow to sequence tasks within a lesson that build upon each other, meet students where they are in their learning and help them understand the progression of skills needed to attain mastery. 

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2, LO4

  • Relating toHow to explicitly model new skills and content through ‘worked examples’ that clearly demonstrate how to complete the task, followed by a progressive removal of scaffolding as students become more proficient.

    Relevant learningLO2, LO5

  • Relating toHow to pitch an introductory lesson at an appropriate level, before starting a new unit of work, by identifying where a student is in their learning through assessing what they know, or think they know. 

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2

  • Relating toHow to design summative assessment to assess students against a standard or benchmark to gain an understanding of the level of mastery attained. 

    Relevant learningLO5

  • Relating toHow to produce and use developmental rubrics with criteria tailored to the specific task and/or work samples so that students understand what is expected. 

    Relevant learningLO5

  • Relating toThe research that shows explicit reading, and writing comprehension instruction tailored to discipline-specific content improves students’ academic understanding and engagement with material, as well as their overall academic performance.  

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2

  • Relating toHow to explicitly deliver reading and writing instruction through discipline and discipline-specific curriculum and pedagogical studies as outlined in standard 4.2.

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2

  • Relating toThe research that shows numeracy is a fundamental component of learning, discourse, and critique across all areas of the curriculum and improves students’ understanding of and engagement with material within and beyond the mathematics curriculum.  

    Relevant learningLO1, LO2

  • Relating toThe research evidence that shows the relationship between effective pedagogical practices and increased positive behaviour including why specific practices are particularly effective in preventing undesired behaviour. 

    Relevant learningLO2, LO5

  • Relating toThe content covered in the Australian Curriculum Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority across stages and subjects.  

    Relevant learningLO1, LO3, LO4

  • Relating toAbout the cultural diversity within classrooms and communities in Australia, and in the local context, to understand and value the perspectives of diverse groups including EAL/D and First Nations students. 

    Relevant learningLO4, LO5

Representative texts and references

Recommended texts and documents

Australian Curriculum https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) www.acara.edu.au

Relevant jurisdictional curriculum documents

ACT Education Directorate: https://www.education.act.gov.au/public-school-life/Our-Curriculum.

New South Wales Education Standards Authority (NESA): https://www.educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/home.

Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (CAA): https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/.

Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA): https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Pages/HomePage.aspx.

Recommended references

Ajayi, L. (2015). Critical multimodal literacy: How Nigerian female students critique texts and reconstruct unequal social structures. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(2), 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X15618441

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2022). Australian Curriculum: Languages (Version 9.0). https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

de Jong, E. J. (2019). Expanding EAL expertise: Taking a multilingual stance. TESOL in Context, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2019vol28no1art907

Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

French, M. (2019). Multilingual pedagogies in practice. TESOL in Context, 28(1), 21–44.

García, O., Johnson, S. I., & Seltzer, K. (2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Caslon.

Kettle, M., Woods, A., & Heimans, S. (2026). Multilingual migrant families’ equal capacity to participate in their children’s education: The benefits of activating home languages in Australian schooling. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. Advance online publication.

Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. Wiley‑Blackwell.

Lo Bianco, J., & Slaughter, Y. (2017). Language policy and education in Australia. In T. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 1–16). Springer.

Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000120

Nation, I. S. P. (2017). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Poetsch, S. (2020). Unrecognised language teaching: Teaching Australian Curriculum content in remote Aboriginal community schools. TESOL in Context, 29(1), 37–58.

Richards, J. C. (2022). Curriculum development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–20, 39.

Scarino, A., & Kohler, M. (2021). Conceptualising language learning and use and its assessment in global contexts. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures, 18(1).

Wilks-Smith, N., Cox, R., & Rook, S. (2026). Countering deficit narratives with translanguaging: The Australian research context. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. Advance online publication.

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEST,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs