Unit rationale, description and aim

Mental health professionals engage with individuals with lived experience of mental ill health across a variety of contexts. Against this background is the often-complex environment in which individuals experience health and wellbeing, and in which mental health professionals provide holistic person-led services. It is imperative that mental health professionals strengthen their understanding of contemporary and complex mental health challenges and develop confidence in implementing a range of recovery-oriented interventions.

This unit builds on and extends foundational knowledge and understanding of recovery. Recovery theory, originally developed in relation to psychotic illness, will be examined as it applies to a range of contemporary mental health practice contexts such as involuntary treatment, criminal justice, life-span development, and as a framework for family work. The unit will explore research from diverse perspectives to consider the theoretical, policy and practice dimensions of recovery principles in these contested settings. It will focus on the development of skills in specific recovery-based interventions such as trauma informed practice, and recovery-based coaching.

The aim of this unit is to provide students with the opportunity to develop advanced knowledge of and ability to apply recovery-oriented interventions in a variety of practice contexts.

2027 10

Campus offering

No unit offerings are currently available for this unit.

Prerequisites

Nil

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Critically analyse contemporary recovery theory, i...

Learning Outcome 01

Critically analyse contemporary recovery theory, including critiques, competing perspectives, and the power and politics shaping recovery-oriented research, policy and practice.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC7

Critically evaluate and apply recovery-oriented ap...

Learning Outcome 02

Critically evaluate and apply recovery-oriented approaches in contested practice contexts, including involuntary treatment and criminal justice settings, drawing on evidence and engaging with competing perspectives of consumers, families and professionals.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Demonstrate skills in relationship-based approache...

Learning Outcome 03

Demonstrate skills in relationship-based approaches to mental health practice in the specialist areas of trauma informed practice and recovery-based coaching
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC4, GC7, GC8, GC11

Synthesise and apply recovery theory across lifesp...

Learning Outcome 04

Synthesise and apply recovery theory across lifespan and physical health contexts, including critical appraisal of life-stage assumptions and the implications of physical health inequities for recovery-oriented practice.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11

Content

Topics will include:

 Contemporary recovery theory

  • Overview of contemporary recovery theory development.
  • Critiques of recovery theory.
  • Competing perspectives in the application of recovery theory.
  • Power and politics of recovery theory.
  • Recovery theory as a framework for mental health research.

 

Recovery theory and involuntary treatment

  • Establishing the evidence base for recovery-informed involuntary treatment.
  • Competing perspectives of consumers, families and workers.
  • Practice approaches to ensuring recovery-focused approaches to involuntary treatment.

 

Recovery theory and the criminal justice system

  • Competing theories of services and treatment of offenders with mental illness.
  • Structure and agency theories.
  • Establishing an evidence base for application of recovery theory in criminal justice jurisdictions.

 

Recovery and physical health

  • Critiques of recovery principles in life-stage theory.
  • Physical health consequences of mental illness.
  • Establishing an evidence base for application of recovery theory in contested areas such as youth and old age.

 

Working in partnership with consumers and families

  • The politics and power of partnerships.
  • Working with competing and contested perspectives.
  • Families and recovery theory.

 

Advanced practice applications of recovery theory

  • Trauma-informed approaches – theory and practice.
  • Coaching approaches – theory and practice.

Assessment strategy and rationale

To pass this unit, students must attempt and submit both assessment tasks, demonstrate achievement of every unit learning outcome, and obtain a minimum mark of 50%.

The assessment strategy supports progressive development of advanced recovery knowledge, critical appraisal and applied practice. Assessment 1 (50%) is a portfolio comprising an applied analysis of an authentic practice scenario and a recorded seminar-style literature appraisal. This task assesses students’ capacity to critically analyse recovery theory and its social and political dimensions and apply recovery-oriented approaches in contested contexts (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4). Assessment 2 (50%) is a critical reflection and practice development plan that requires students to synthesise evidence to inform ongoing professional learning and to plan for the application of recovery-oriented, relationship-based interventions within a complex or contested area relevant to their context (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4). Together, the two assessments provide opportunities for students to demonstrate evidence-informed reasoning, professional communication and reflective practice.

Overview of assessments

Assessment 1: Applied analysis and seminar presen...

Assessment 1: Applied analysis and seminar presentation

Students complete an applied analysis of a practice scenario to demonstrate integration of recovery theory within complex and contested practice contexts, and prepare a short recorded seminar presentation that critically appraises the literature relating to recovery-oriented interventions and their theoretical, social and political context.

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11, GC12

Assessment 2: Critical reflection and practice de...

Assessment 2: Critical reflection and practice development plan

Students submit a critical reflection demonstrating how advanced recovery theory and evidence has informed their ongoing professional learning and practice. Students identify a complex or contested area relevant to their context (e.g., involuntary treatment, criminal justice, lifespan/physical health, or family work) and develop an evidence-informed plan for applying recovery-oriented, relationship-based interventions (including trauma-informed practice and/or recovery-based coaching) in a recovery-focused way.

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

Learning and teaching strategies utilised in this unit will support students in meeting the aim and achieving the learning outcomes relevant to this unit, as well as to the broader course learning outcomes. This unit uses an active learning approach to support students in the exploration of advanced recovery theory and practice. Delivered as fully online, asynchronous learning allows students to learn at their own pace within the parameters of the teaching term. Weekly modules are structured around an inquiry cycle (engage, explore, apply and reflect) that guides students from key concepts and evidence to analysis of authentic scenarios. Learning is further supported through facilitated asynchronous discussion forums, weekly online drop-in sessions, and an online assessment session for each assessment task with the unit's online facilitator. The discussion forums provide students with activities that encourage students to critically discuss concepts, share practice-based examples (including from their own professional contexts), and provide constructive peer feedback. These activities are designed to build a learning community and deepen critical reflection in a supported online environment. Students receive regular and timely feedback on their learning, which includes information on their progress.

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. (2013). A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: Guide for practitioners and providers. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

Bland, R., Renouf, N., & Tullgren, A. (2015). Social work practice in mental health: An introduction (2nd ed.). Allen & Unwin.

Bland, R., & Wyder, M. (2024). Families and recovery: Beyond clinical and social inclusion perspectives. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 25(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v25i1.2303

Chieze, M., Hurst, S., Kaiser, S., & Sentissi, O. (2019). Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Article 491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491

Gooding, P., McSherry, B., & Roper, C. (2020). Preventing and reducing ‘coercion’ in mental health services: An international scoping review of English-language studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 142(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13152

Hailemariam, M., Bustos, T. E., Montgomery, B. W., Brown, G., Tefera, G., Adaji, R., Taylor, B., Eshetu, H., Barajas, C., Barajas, R., Najjar, V., Dennis, D., Hudson, J., Felton, J. W., & Johnson, J. E. (2024). Mental health interventions for individuals with serious mental illness in the criminal legal system: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 24, Article 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05612-7

Han, H.-R., Miller, H. N., Nkimbeng, M., Budhathoki, C., Mikhael, T., Rivers, E., Abry, A., & Giurgescu, C. (2021). Trauma-informed interventions: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 16(6), Article e0252747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252747

Meadows, G., Farhall, J., Fossey, E. M., Happell, B., McDermott, F., & Rosenberg, S. (Eds.). (2020). Mental health and collaborative community practice: An Australian perspective (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Melillo, A., Sansone, N., Allan, J., Gill, N., Herrman, H., Morales Cano, G., Rodrigues, M., Savage, M., & Galderisi, S. (2025). Recovery-oriented and trauma-informed care for people with mental disorders to promote human rights and quality of mental health care: A scoping review. BMC Psychiatry, 25, Article 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06473-4

Tew, J., Ramon, S., Slade, M., Bird, V., Melton, J., & Le Boutillier, C. (2012). Social factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: A review of the evidence. British Journal of Social Work, 42(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr076

Tondora, J., Miller, R., Slade, M., & Davidson, L. (2014). Partnering for recovery in mental health: A practical guide to person-centered planning. Wiley-Blackwell.

Waldemar, A. K., Esbensen, B. A., Korsbek, L., Petersen, L., & Arnfred, S. (2019). Recovery-oriented practice: Participant observations of the interactions between patients and health professionals in mental health inpatient settings. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(1), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12537

Wyder, M., & Bland, R. (2014). The recovery framework as a way of understanding families’ responses to mental illness: Balancing different needs and recovery journeys. Australian Social Work, 67(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2013.875580

Wyder, M., Bland, R., Herriot, A., & Crompton, D. (2015). The experiences of the legal processes of involuntary treatment orders: Tension between the legal and medical frameworks. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 38, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.006

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEST,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs