Unit rationale, description and aim

This unit introduces recovery‑oriented mental health practice as a foundational capability for contemporary mental health professionals in Australia. The unit positions recovery beyond symptom reduction, emphasising lived experience, identity, self‑determination and participation, and recognising the social, cultural and systemic conditions that enable or constrain recovery.Drawing on lived experience scholarship, consumer and peer movements, and recovery frameworks, the unit compares recovery‑oriented and traditional approaches to mental health practice. Students explore person‑centred, strengths‑based and trauma‑informed principles, and consider how these are enacted within mental health practice contexts.

The unit also considers recovery within the realities of the Australian mental health system, including mental health legislation, ethics and professional responsibilities, autonomy, consent and duty of care. The roles of families, carers and communities are explored alongside the impacts of stigma, shame and structural barriers to participation. Throughout the unit, students are encouraged to reflect critically on language, power and practice, and to consider how recovery‑oriented approaches can support meaningful participation, resilience and socially valued roles.

The aim of this unit is to develop students’ foundational understanding of recovery‑oriented and trauma‑informed mental health practice in Australia, and to critically reflect on how these approaches inform their professional practice.

2027 10

Campus offering

No unit offerings are currently available for this unit.

Prerequisites

Nil

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Explain the development of recovery as a concept i...

Learning Outcome 01

Explain the development of recovery as a concept in mental health, including contributions from the mental health consumer movement, lived experience scholarship and recovery models used internationally and in Australia.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC6, GC7, GC9, GC11

Analyse recovery oriented principles (including pe...

Learning Outcome 02

Analyse recovery oriented principles (including person centred, strengths based and trauma informed practice) and their application to contemporary mental health practice across service contexts.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC9, GC11, GC12

Critically examine social, cultural, ethical and l...

Learning Outcome 03

Critically examine social, cultural, ethical and legal dimensions of recovery oriented mental health practice in Australia, including mental health systems and legislation, autonomy, consent, duty of care, and barriers to participation such as stigma.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC9, GC11

Reflect critically on the impact of trauma for ind...

Learning Outcome 04

Reflect critically on the impact of trauma for individuals with mental distress and their families and carers, and on the implications of trauma informed approaches for mental health practice and service environments.
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC6, GC7, GC9, GC11

Content

Topics will include:

Conceptual frameworks for recovery‑oriented mental health practice

  • Recovery as a concept: personal, social and systemic perspectives (including personal and clinical recovery)
  • The mental health consumer movement and lived experience scholarship
  • Development of recovery‑oriented practice internationally and in Australia
  • Recovery narratives, identity and meaning


Recovery‑oriented principles and capabilities

  • Person‑centred practice
  • Self‑determination and self‑management
  • Strengths‑based approaches
  • Recovery language and collaborative partnerships
  • Participation, inclusion and socially valued roles


Recovery‑oriented systems and models of care

  • Enabling recovery‑oriented service systems
  • Peer work and lived‑experience roles
  • Mental health services and systems in Australia
  • Recovery‑oriented alternatives to traditional mental health practice
  • Working with diversity and community contexts


Trauma‑informed and family‑inclusive practice

  • Trauma and its impacts on individuals, families and carers
  • Principles of trauma‑informed care
  • Recovery‑oriented service environments
  • Integrating strengths‑based and trauma‑informed approaches


Legal, ethical and social dimensions of recovery‑oriented practice

  • Mental health legislation and legal frameworks in Australia
  • Autonomy, consent, capacity, confidentiality and duty of care
  • Ethics and professional responsibilities
  • Stigma, shame and structural barriers to participation
  • Recovery in Australian mental health policy and reform contexts

Assessment strategy and rationale

To pass this unit, students must attempt and submit both assessment tasks, demonstrate achievement of every unit learning outcome, and obtain a minimum mark of 50%.

The assessment strategy supports progressive development of foundational knowledge, critical reflection and professional reasoning for recovery‑oriented and trauma‑informed mental health practice. Assessment 1 (oral presentation) develops students’ ability to synthesise evidence and lived experience scholarship to compare recovery‑oriented and traditional approaches and to justify practice recommendations (LO1–LO4). Assessment 2 (critical reflective essay) builds on this foundation by requiring students to analyse an authentic practice scenario and demonstrate professional reasoning through explicit application of recovery and trauma‑informed principles, relevant ethical and legal considerations, and evaluation of options and implications, leading to justified recommendations that support recovery and safety (LO1–LO4).

Overview of assessments

Assessment Task 1 – Oral Presentation Students ...

Assessment Task 1 – Oral Presentation


Students will deliver an oral presentation that compares recovery‑oriented and traditional approaches to mental health practice and demonstrates professional reasoning by justifying practice recommendations using recovery frameworks, lived experience scholarship and relevant ethical considerations. 

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC9, GC11, GC12

Assessment Task 2 – Critical reflective essay ...

Assessment Task 2 – Critical reflective essay


Students will critically evaluate practices and policies in a practice scenario using recovery‑oriented and trauma‑informed perspectives and apply professional reasoning to justify proposed improvements that support recovery, safety, rights and participation within Australian service contexts.

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC9, GC11

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

Learning and teaching strategies utilised in this unit will support students in meeting the aim and achieving the learning outcomes relevant to this unit, as well as to the broader course learning outcomes. This unit uses an active learning approach to support students in the exploration of knowledge essential to recovery-oriented practice. Delivered as fully online, asynchronous learning allows students to learn at their own pace within the parameters of the teaching term. Weekly modules are structured around an inquiry cycle (engage, explore, apply and reflect) that guides students from key concepts and evidence to analysis of authentic scenarios. Learning is further supported through facilitated asynchronous discussion forums, weekly online drop-in sessions, and an online assessment session for each assessment task with the unit's online facilitator. The discussion forums provide students with activities that encourage students to critically discuss concepts, share practice-based examples (including from their own professional contexts), and provide constructive peer feedback. These activities are designed to build a learning community and deepen critical reflection in a supported online environment. Students receive regular and timely feedback on their learning, which includes information on their progress.

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. (2013). A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: Guide for practitioners and providers. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

Cooper, R. E., Saunders, K. R. K., Greenburgh, A., Shah, P., Appleton, R., Machin, K., Jeynes, T., Barnett, P., Allan, S. M., Griffiths, J., Stuart, R., Mitchell, L., Chipp, B., Jeffreys, S., Lloyd-Evans, B., Simpson, A., & Johnson, S. (2024). The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: A systematic umbrella review. BMC Medicine, 22, Article 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03260-y

Davidson, L. (2016). The recovery movement: Implications for mental health care and enabling people to participate fully in life. Health Affairs, 35(6), 1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0153

Deegan, P. E. (1997). Recovery and empowerment for people with psychiatric disabilities. In U. Aviram (Ed.), Social work in mental health care: Trends and issues (pp. 11–24). Haworth Press.

Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733

Leamy, M., Foye, U., Hirrich, A., Bjørgen, D., Silver, J., Simpson, A., Ellis, M., & Johan-Johanson, K. (2023). A systematic review of measures of the personal recovery orientation of mental health services and staff. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 17, Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00600-y

Llewellyn-Beardsley, J., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Callard, F., Crawford, P., Farkas, M., Hui, A., Manley, D., McGranahan, R., Pollock, K., Ramsay, A., Sælør, K. T., Wright, N., & Slade, M. (2019). Characteristics of mental health recovery narratives: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0214678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214678

Mahon, D. (2024). An umbrella review of systematic reviews on trauma informed approaches. Community Mental Health Journal, 60, 1627–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01317-z

National Mental Health Commission. (2021). National lived experience (peer) workforce development guidelines. Australian Government.

Repper, J., & Carter, T. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20(4), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2011.583947

Reeves, V., McIntyre, H., Loughhead, M., Halpin, M. A., & Procter, N. (2024). Actions targeting the integration of peer workforces in mental health organisations: A mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 24, Article 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05664-9

Rose, D. (2014). The mainstreaming of recovery. Journal of Mental Health, 23(5), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.928406

Slade, M. (2009). Personal recovery and mental illness: A guide for mental health professionals. Cambridge University Press.

Smit, D., Miguel, C., Vrijsen, J. N., Groeneweg, B., Spijker, J., & Cuijpers, P. (2023). The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 53(11), 5332–5341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722002422

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach (HHS Publication No. SMA 14-4884). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Sweeney, A., Filson, B., Kennedy, A., Collinson, L., & Gillard, S. (2018). A paradigm shift: Relationships in trauma-informed mental health services. BJPsych Advances, 24(5), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2018.29

van Weeghel, J., van Zelst, C., Boertien, D., & Hasson-Ohayon, I. (2019). Conceptualizations, Assessments, and Implications of Personal Recovery in Mental Illness: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal42(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000356

World Health Organization. (2021). Guidance on community mental health services: Promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. World Health Organization.

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEST,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs